The July 27 letter beginning with the line "[e]very CEO in Minnesota should be ashamed" was full of fake news. For instance, the writer says that "Best Buy's lowest-paid employee has to pay the same price for a banana, for gas, for a car, for health care and other expenses as the CEO." That's demonstrably false. Corporate CEOs pay much more for their fresh, organic bananas than those brown-tinged things the lowest-paid Best Buy employee can afford. The CEOs pay much more for the high-octane gas they use in their high-end autos than that used by the lowest-paid Best Buy employee in her 10-year-old car. And how ridiculous it is to say that the lowest-paid Best Buy employee with extraordinary high insurance deductibles — assuming he can even afford insurance — pays the same as the CEOs do for their gold-plated coverage. Really, it's the Star Tribune that should be ashamed for printing such letters attacking those who simply are trying to make America great again, letters that set up a false equivalence between the lowest-paid Best Buy employee and those who, as Tolstoy said, will do anything to help the poor — except get off their backs.
Dean Karau, Burnsville
• • •
It's interesting and not surprising to read the reactions in the July 27 letters to the July 22 article "Calculating the gap" about CEO compensation. What's missing is any recognition of the "skill gap."
CEOs generally have invisible skills like vision — the ability to see the invisible that enables them to create, scale and manage great enterprises that employ thousands of people. Steve Jobs, Elon Musk, Roger Penske, to name a few.
We don't hear an outcry about an $84 million quarterback or a gazillion-dollar LeBron James type, because their skills are visible (and we know we can't do what they do), yet some people think "anyone" can be a CEO.
Jim Peterson, Gold Canyon, Ariz.
'DENIED JUSTICE'
Reporters uncovered it — but policymakers, officials couldn't?
Nate Gove, director of the Minnesota Peace Officer Standards and Training Board, is quoted as saying he knew nothing of the ordeals of Minneapolis rape victims until "I read it in the paper." ("Cop board to address rape case failings," July 27.) Proof again (remember the exposé of elder abuse by the Star Tribune?) of how important in-depth investigative newspaper reporting is.
Patricia Calvert, Rochester
• • •
Administrators, policymakers and prosecutors express shock and surprise at the abysmal lack of protection afforded women by the criminal-justice system. If news reporters can readily access this data, what barriers other than lack of concern prevent those responsible for oversight from having it?