I held my forehead, mouth agape, reading about the initial chemical findings on the Animas spill. It's paralysis-inducing data, and officials are lying about the significance — flat out.
While the Environmental Protection Agency is the proximal cause, from what we know, I hope the appropriately named river provides the catalytic animus to jump-start a very critical discussion on how and why we create these vast volumes of poison in service of our day-to-day activities.
Let's remember, too, that we've often dumped and typically still dump these things among poor folks, locally and globally. This is a visible error insomuch as we've all seen it; I submit that worse occurs beyond our view.
Taqee Khaled, St. Paul
• • •
People in five states are directly affected and more downstream may see some of the toxic pollution caused by a mistake at the cleanup site of an abandoned gold mine in Colorado. Minnesota, too, has had some problems with mining waste. Take a trip with Google Earth and check out the Iron Range — all the concentrating plants have tailing basins that have the potential of harming nearby waterways, lakes and rivers. Minntac has a large one north of Virginia on the other side of the divide where water flows north to Lake Vermilion and on to the border lakes. A spill from Minntac tailing basin cell one would flow to Lake Vermilion.
Until the mining industry gets it act together and finds ways to treat its waste, the EPA needs to tightly monitor these sites. The fact that now overseas corporations want to mine near the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness should not be considered until the mess they are still making is treated to make it safe. Our lakes and streams are much different from the fast-flowing mountain streams that flush themselves — our waters slowly wind through the land and will hold the toxic pollution. The land on the Canadian Shield is fragile and has taken eons to develop. We need to protect these beautiful gifts of nature.
Jim Goudy, Ranier, Minn.
PRESCRIPTION DRUGS
A costly treatment for hepatitis C, but if the goal is survival …
The writers of the Aug. 10 commentary "Health care reform: Who gets hepatitis C drugs? Who pays?" stated: "In the worst cases, hepatitis C patients require liver transplants, a high-risk operation that can cost up to $500,000." I feel angry and sad about what's implied by that statement. My wife died in 2011 at age 61 from liver failure caused by hepatitis C. She had contracted the virus in her late teens and early 20s while using drugs. In her late 20s, she became sober and stayed sober until her death. She made mistakes but didn't ask to get hepatitis C. The people today who've gotten hepatitis C in many different ways? They didn't ask for it, either. The worst-case scenario isn't money; it's death.
John Crawford, Minneapolis
ANIMAL WELFARE
Eye-opening reports on turkey farming, research dogs
Thank you for the Aug. 12 front-page article about turkey farming ("Fresh off flu die-off, farmers try comeback"), with photos of a poult (a baby turkey) and a sorting line that separates toms from hens. The page the article jumped to, however, was eye-opening indeed. It shows the poults being subjected to toe-clipping (obviously painful), which will be followed by vaccination and beak-clipping (also painful).