Annette Meeks' March 27 commentary "Our transit system is off the rails" raised some important points. I fully agree that we need a long-range funding mechanism for our transportation system, especially the mass-transit component, which traditionally seems to attract little support from legislators outside the metro area. Perhaps a targeted sales tax increase for the metro area is one of several options.
I agree that commuter rail is falling far short of expectations. The answer is not to close down the Northstar Line, but to expand it to St. Cloud, where it should have gone in the first place. Meeks' suggestion to stop funding Southwest light rail is shortsighted, however. The first two legs of light rail are performing above expectations, so it appears that it is a "need," not just a "want." The system will work even better when all four planned parts are completed. Only then will we get the full value of what we have already invested in it. We need to work hard to protect the federal match for the Southwest line's construction, since it is a classic example of a "shovel-ready" project after 10 years of work.
Our sister cities are pulling farther and farther ahead of us in building these rail transit systems. They must think that these systems are a need, not just a want.
John Crosby, Minneapolis
• • •
Meeks presents a strong economic argument against expanding the public transit system in our area. What is lacking in the argument is the inclusion of the amount of subsidy that is needed to build and maintain roads and bridges. The gasoline tax does not come close to covering these expenses. Consequently, every automobile is subsidized from tax dollars. Those who do not own or drive an automobile pay taxes to support those who do. Nor does Meeks' commentary include the human element. The elderly and the poor rely on mass transit. Completing Northstar to St. Cloud makes the Twin Cities accessible to the elderly who live in the St. Cloud area. For everyone's safety, it is good to keep us elderly off busy highways. Finally, the environmental impact cannot be ignored. Since mass transit reduces the number of cars on the road, it reduces the air pollution that they produce.
Wilfred Theisen, Collegeville, Minn.
SOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL
Can you credibly favor the line if you have a stake in the matter?
Kelly Doran ("Pitch to halt federal funding for Southwest LRT is preposterous," March 29) miscalculated the certainty and timing of the Southwest project and is understandably worried about his company's investment in The Moline, a Hopkins luxury apartment complex slated to open this fall, the success of which is dependent on the completion of the light-rail line. While he makes some valid criticisms of the arguments made by light-rail opponents in the Legislature, let's keep in mind his true motivation: maximizing the return on investment for Doran Companies. Secondarily, Doran may be gearing up for another foray into politics. He ran campaigns (as a Democrat) for U.S. Senate and governor after the shopping center boom ended; he'll need something to do once he's done riding the luxury apartment building wave.
John Grimes, Minneapolis
• • •
In response to Doran's opinion that halting federal funding for LRT is preposterous, I would like to ask him if he plans on housing low-income residents who will be riding the Southwest line past his apartment development.