Al Franken was not railroaded, and complaining about his treatment now shouldn't win him any new sympathy ("Second thoughts on Franken ouster," front page, July 23). Representing the people of Minnesota is not a legal right, it is a privilege, and we deserve to ask the highest character of our representatives. I enthusiastically voted for Al twice, but he lost my confidence when allegations of groping came from not one but several women. Resignation was the right thing to do. Minnesota got a terrific (and now elected) senator, and Democrats got the moral high ground that allowed Doug Jones to win a special election for the U.S. Senate in Alabama and save the Affordable Care Act. Al would do better to continue to put the common good ahead of his personal interests. That's what politics is about.
Aaron Berger, Minneapolis
• • •
Like Franken, who regrets resigning his Senate seat, and the seven senators who now regret calling for his resignation, I too regret Al's departure. He was one of the strongest voices in government supporting policies I believe necessary to make America a better place for everyone but the uber-rich.
I read the allegations against Franken carefully as they emerged, and I concluded that the most egregious thing he may have done was to wrap his hand around a "muffin top" (which I understand to be a unisex term) while having his photo taken with a woman at the State Fair. His punishment did not fit his crime, and it will be a cold day in hell before I give an ounce of support to the unremorseful U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand.
Craig Laughlin, Plymouth
THE STATE OF POLITICS
Disagreeing with someone isn't racist. Here's what is.
Dear Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin: Your comments this past week about President Donald Trump's tweets are half true. Of course it is not racist for a white person to disagree with the ideas of a person of color. What is racist is for someone to have to be told that his words are deeply and historically wounding. What is racist is to allow a crowd that he controls and that he has worked into a frenzy to continue to chant those words, and then to call them patriots. What is racist is to continually claim to not be racist. Someone not racist would apologize humbly. How I long for the late U.S. Sen. John McCain's respect for the person but disagreement with ideas. Please be careful, Mr. Mnuchin. There is a reason witnesses take an oath to tell "the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth." Half-truths are just as destructive as lies. Perhaps they are even more dangerous because they masquerade as the whole truth and are meant to justify the unjustifiable.
Carol McNamara, Minneapolis
• • •
America is still a country where one is allowed to have an opinion. If it is the wrong opinion, according to the progressive liberals, you have left yourself open to ridicule and name-calling. The media seems to control what is the right or wrong opinion to have. I, myself, prefer to look at both sides of the issue and make an informed decision.
Dennis Malone, Glenwood, Minn.
• • •
Our Republican elected officials — unfortunately even those in Minnesota — appear to be in the norming stage of group development, where comments by the president intended to incite aggression against women of color are normed to "just politics." My reading of group dynamics is that during the norming stage, Trump and his ilk feel they can do and say anything about anyone at anytime, and when called out, they feel hurt and as if they've been attacked themselves. After all, racism is a negative word when spewed by anyone but the president and his cohorts. I read today that Trump's aides encouraged the president's continued racist attacks in an attempt to solidify his base. The "us vs. the evil them" strategy has nothing to do with policy, of course, and everything to do with dividing Americans into tribes that are always on the verge of war. And, if that war happens to cause injury to someone on the other side, well, so be it.
I spoke with a former Minnesota state senator on Tuesday morning and asked if ad hominem attacks were common practice in the Minnesota Legislature. Of course, he said no. There were often heated policy debates, he said, but never the kind of outright racism and incendiary attacks that threaten people's lives.