There was a certain irony that the St. Louis Blues used a 4-on-4 to score the winning goal with 2:27 left to take a second straight 2-1 win in St. Paul on Friday night.
Three years ago, it drove Mike Yeo loco how the referees constantly called 4-on-4s in the Wild's playoff series against Colorado, saying at one point it seemed to be a tactic by the faster, more skilled Avs knowing referees usually try to even things up in scrums.
Tonight, after a game full of goalmouth scrums and skirmishes, referee Brad Meier called a 4-on-4 after Scottie Upshall ran Charlie Coyle, drove him into the ice and through a linesman. Coyle got up, got in Upshall's face, did his best not to retaliate, but a scrum ensured and a 4-on-4 was called.
That's not excusing the fact that the Wild downright stinks at 4-on-4. There's no reason it should stink with its speed and skill, but as I noted during a sort of doomsday tweet right after the calls, it's not the Wild's forte, that's for sure.
"It's pretty disappointing we're playing 4-on-4 in the playoffs on that play on the wall," Dubnyk said. "That's unacceptable in a 1-1 hockey game to make that call, it just doesn't make sense. You can watch it a hundred times, there's zero reason. It's either a penalty on them or it's no penalty. I'm not saying it's a penalty on them, it's just no penalty. Why make it a 4-on-4 game with four minutes left? It's not to make excuses, it's just they made a play."
So, after "killing" the first 1:36 of the 4-on-4, the Wild gave up the winner.
David Perron did a masterful job of driving the middle after Alex Pietrangelo fed Jaden Schwartz coming off the bench, that got Jonas Brodin to back off and Schwartz fired through Brodin's legs and over top Dubnyk's glove for the winning goal.
"Yeah, I didn't see the puck," Dubnyk said.
The Wild fell to 2-10 in Game 2 all-time, including six consecutive losses.