Picture this: The Vikings have scored a touchdown with "00:00" flashed up on the clock to pull within one point of Aaron Rodgers and the rival Green Bay Packers.
Should they kick the extra point — no longer a gimme now that the ball will be snapped from the 15-yard line — and play for overtime? Or do they put the ball in the hands of Teddy Bridgewater or Adrian Peterson and go for the two-point conversion and the win?
Blair Walsh knows what he would do.
"The way you have to look at it is, what would you have done last year? You would kick the extra point," said Walsh, who was an All-Pro kicker in 2012 for the Vikings. "Adding 13 yards to the kick shouldn't really make you not trust your kicker at that point."
The conventional wisdom among NFL coaches — even Bill Belichick and Chip Kelly, two notable mad geniuses in a sport filled with closed-minded men in headsets — always had been to trot out the kicker for what amounted to a 20-yard attempt.
But now that there is a higher degree of difficulty when it comes to kicking the point after touchdown (PAT) after NFL owners approved a rule change Tuesday, there have been conversations among folks with cleats, keyboards, radio microphones and even graphing calculators about whether we will see teams go for two more often.
The consensus, even in the face of convincing statistical analysis?
"I can't imagine that it will make a significant dent in how teams approach the extra point, even if the point value leans slightly in the favor of going for two," said Bill Barnwell, who writes about the NFL for ESPN's Grantland website.