Only one person had the motive, the ability and the opportunity to kill Margorie Holland in the Apple Valley townhouse she shared with her husband, prosecutor Phil Prokopowicz told a jury Monday.
That person was her husband, Roger E. Holland, who is charged in Dakota County District Court with two counts each of first-degree premeditated murder and second-degree intentional murder for allegedly strangling his 37-year-old wife, who was 15 weeks pregnant with their first child.
His fate is now in the hands of the jury, which listened to closing arguments from Prokopowicz and defense attorney Marsh Halberg on Monday before breaking for lunch, then started deliberations about 1:30 p.m.
Jurors have testimony of more than two dozen witnesses — including Holland — and upward of 500 pieces of evidence to sift through to reach their verdict.
"It is not easy to strangle someone to death," Prokopowicz said in his closing argument. "Think of the intensity of that moment, whatever he used to squeeze, squeeze, squeeze.
"She fought," he said. "She fought for her life and that of her unborn child."
Halberg, however, told the jury that the lead police investigator "convicted Holland in the first five minutes."
Any evidence that pointed toward accidental causes for Margorie Holland's death was ignored. Suffocation, rather than strangulation, was never considered as a possible cause of death. The first statements Holland gave police were lost or destroyed. And the 25 law enforcers and rescuers who were in the Hollands' townhouse the day of her death could very well have contaminated the scene with unknown DNA.