June started with news about big proposed premium increases on health insurance sold to individuals, including those buying on the state's MNsure health insurance exchange. In some cases, the proposals call for rate increases of more than 50 percent. By month's end, the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to rule on a legal challenge to the health law that launched MNsure. Plaintiffs argue that the federal Affordable Care Act only allows tax credits for people who buy through state-based exchanges like MNsure, but not the federal HealthCare.gov exchange that covers 34 states. It all makes for exciting times at MNsure, where Allison O'Toole got the chief executive job on an interim basis in May.
Q: What impact could the Supreme Court ruling have on MNsure?
A: Minnesotans don't have anything to worry about with this ruling. My biggest fear is that it may cause confusion for them, but the states that are running state-based exchanges aren't going to be impacted by this.
Q: If the court rules that tax credits aren't available on the federal exchange, there's been talk of an administrative fix that might create a state-based regional exchange based on existing marketplaces. Has MNsure been a part of any such plans?
A: There are a lot of hypotheticals out there. … If we are approached to engage in those conversations, we will. But our focus is really on making sure the system works for Minnesotans and that they get the tax credits that they deserve.
Q: A ruling for plaintiffs in the cases could prevent discussion of a state partnership with the federal HealthCare.gov platform, which is being used by Oregon and considered in Vermont. Obviously, there was discussion at the Legislature this session about whether the state should use HealthCare.gov. Could a ruling against the government be a loss for Minnesota, because it would block a partnership?
A: These are all hypotheticals, so it's hard to comment. During the session … there was talk about HealthCare.gov, [but] it's just not that simple. We just have a totally different [system] — we have a policy in place right now that consumers have one front door for their health care, so that's with MinnesotaCare and Medical Assistance and the private plans. HealthCare.gov doesn't do that.
Q: The proposed rate increases in the individual market apply to more than 240,000 people. To what extent do they apply to people in MNsure policies, vs. off-exchange policies.