Donors have poured more than $18 million into campaigns for and against constitutional amendments voters will face next week, making those ballot fights the most expensive Minnesota has ever seen.
More than half of the cash has gone to the fight against an amendment that would ban same-sex marriage. Following closely are groups fighting for control of the Legislature -- they have spent more than $14 million to sway Minnesotans.
That money has resulted in Minnesotans being unable to watch television, pick up the phone or check the mail without someone telling them how to vote. In the final week before voters make their wishes known, the tension -- and spending -- will only grow as high-profile donors and activists weigh in.
Released Tuesday, the state finance reports tell a lopsided story of fundraising and spending. With only a few exceptions, liberal and Democratic interests outpaced conservative and Republican ones in raising and spending money on Minnesota campaigns.
Minnesotans United for All Families, the group trying to defeat the measure, has raised more than $10 million -- with $2.75 million of that coming in the past month, according to reports filed Tuesday. The group also said it had received $1.2 million of in-kind contributions and reports having more than $300,000 on hand.
"As we enter the final days of this campaign, we will continue to remind Minnesotans what is really at stake -- and that's whether we're going to vote, in 2012, to limit the freedom to marry for one group of people," said Richard Carlbom, Minnesotans United campaign manager.
Minnesota for Marriage, the lead group pushing the measure, had technical problems transmitting their report to the campaign finance agency, spokesman Chuck Darrell said. Darrell said the group has raised $5 million since the campaign began.
Campaign chairman John Helmberger said the group lately has experienced a "surge in the number of contributors and contributions [that] has allowed us to step up our TV, billboard and radio ads that focus on what happens ... when same-sex marriage has been imposed elsewhere."