A New York-based electricity provider is suing two Minnesota public agencies over a law it claims improperly favors home-state companies for new power line projects.
The 2012 state law gives "incumbent" electricity transmission providers in Minnesota a "right of first refusal" for new power line projects. In other words, they get first dibs over companies that don't currently have transmission lines in Minnesota.
The law is anti-competitive and violates the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution, said the suit filed Friday by LSP Transmission Holdings in U.S. District Court in Minneapolis.
"There are a few other states that have such laws," said Ari Peskoe, a senior fellow at Harvard Law School's Environmental Policy Initiative.
None has been tested in a federal court. The suit by LSP Transmission "could set an important precedent," Peskoe said.
LSP is suing the five members of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC); and Minnesota Department of Commerce Commissioner Mike Rothman.
The PUC approves new transmission lines, while the Commerce Department makes recommendations to the PUC and is responsible for enforcing the right-of-first refusal law, the suit said. Both agencies declined to comment.
LSP Transmission owns 500 miles of transmission lines in two states, but not Minnesota, and is developing projects in six other states. The company is an arm of LS Power Group, a developer, owner and operator of electricity generation and transmission projects.