Narayana Kocherlakota's first year as president of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank proceeded smoothly in 2010 as he made the rounds of the vast Ninth Federal Reserve District, which stretches 1,800 miles from Michigan's Upper Peninsula in the east to Montana in the west.
Then came an Aug. 17 speech in Marquette, Mich., where the newest and youngest regional Federal Reserve president suggested that the nation's high unemployment rate might reflect a structural mismatch between the jobs that were available and the skills of those looking for work.
If that were the case, Kocherlakota said, the Fed "does not have a means to transform construction workers into manufacturing workers."
Kocherlakota's words, coming just months before he was to become a voting member of the Federal Open Market Committee, served as tinder for a debate already raging in policy circles and across the blogosphere. Those fearful that the Fed had already set the stage for an era of hyperinflation suddenly saw, in Kocherlakota, a kindred, conservative voice among Fed bank presidents.
Meanwhile, those worried that the Fed was not doing enough to stimulate the economy and put more people to work, reacted with alarm and, at times, derision. Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman described the notion of a mismatch as "simply bizarre" and an excuse to do nothing.
And here was the headline on a blog post from Berkeley economist Brad DeLong: "The sad thing is that Narayana Kocherlakota was supposed to be the smart one among the Minnesota economists."
Ouch.
Kocherlakota continues to think that structural unemployment could be a factor in the future, as the unemployment rate falls and the Fed weighs when to raise interest rates. But he has little interest in revisiting the reaction to his August speech. If anything, though, the experience may have better prepared him for his new role on the FOMC.