When Minnesota legislators ended their 2015 lawmaking season with two major bills stalled in partisan gridlock, they voiced hope that conditions more propitious for dealmaking would emerge in time for the 2016 session.
That session starts at noon Tuesday with those hopes largely unrealized. The DFL-controlled Senate and the GOP-led House are obliged to pick up Tuesday where they left off last spring. Little has changed in the past nine months, save for the increasing tension of an election year in which no statewide office is on the ballot and legislators' electoral fates are linked to the most volatile presidential contest in decades.
That backdrop is bound to factor in every major move legislators make in the brief 10-week regular session. If nervous legislators in both parties are most concerned with keeping their fractious bases satisfied, last year's paralysis could continue, to Minnesota's detriment.
But the presidential race offers a larger message we hope legislators heed: Voters have had their fill of gridlock-prone, politics-as-usual government. Legislators in both parties were elected in 2014 with promises of progress toward solutions of vexing state problems. They can expect to feel voters' wrath if they don't deliver.
A lot needs doing in a session foreshortened to accommodate the reconstruction of the State Capitol, where only the House will meet this year. The Senate has decamped to the sleek new Minnesota Senate Building, which was designed to accommodate House floor sessions this year as well. The House's refusal to leave the Capitol is more about politics than practicality, and strikes us as petty.
The two chambers' physical separation is bound to complicate legislators' task. It should not be an excuse for more of the closed-door negotiating that Minnesotans saw too much of last May, to little good result. Legislators should be on notice: Public tolerance of their lack of transparency has grown thin.
Atop this year's to-do list is the unfinished business of 2015: the transportation and tax bills. They've become a de facto package deal. Legislators will be hard-pressed to muster majorities for one without the other — and even then, they'll need plenty of pressure, particularly from the business community, to find agreement. The deal we think would serve Minnesota best: new money for transportation, including transit, in exchange for a prudent portion of the tax cut Republicans seek.
"A prudent portion" grew smaller with the latest state budget forecast, which foretold an economy slowing as the baby boom generation retires. The state's spendable surplus through June 2017 stands at $900 million, down from $1.2 billion, and only half of that sum can safely be used for ongoing obligations. That's a limit legislators should respect. Maintaining state government's hard-won fiscal stability ought to be a top priority.