Dakota County District Judge Kathryn Davis Messerich ruled that a second batch of test results on drug evidence first examined at the troubled St. Paul police crime lab can be admitted in court.
Public defender Lauri Traub had argued that the samples, retested by the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, could have been contaminated at the police lab because of poor workplace practices, poor equipment maintenance and staff's failure to follow basic scientific procedures.
Messerich issued her decision Friday, ending a nearly yearlong probe into the police lab's operations, which have led to major overhauls at the lab and a review of drug cases before three county attorneys.
"In summary, the testimony of these witnesses supported the possibility of contamination rather than the actual presence of contamination," Messerich wrote in her decision. "The State has met its burden here because a jury could reasonably conclude that the evidence came into and left the [police lab] in the same condition."
Traub said she was disappointed with Messerich's decision, but thankful that the questions she and former public defender Christine Funk raised last year led to changes at the police lab.
"Look at what happened because we had this hearing," Traub said. "Everybody found out about the problems with the crime lab and the crime lab realized it needed to make improvements and it started doing that."
Messerich wrote that "there were not substantial differences" between how police lab criminalists and BCA forensic scientist Eric Grunwald handled evidence and cleaned their work stations. Defense attorneys attempted to raise skepticism about how the police lab, which is not accredited, handled those tasks. Grunwald retested the drug evidence in the three Dakota County cases, and testified on behalf of the prosecution.
Traub said the comparison wasn't equitable, because BCA scientists are better trained than the police's criminalists.