Something greater from the difference.
I have been in a lot of client meetings where we have discussed giving — to family, to friends, to causes. Rios's poem points out how impactful giving can be as well as how difficult. What are the things we can think about before we decide to give?
A gift with strings attached isn't a gift, it is a payment for expected behavior. This is fine, but money given this way may be as likely to wound as it is to help the recipient. Gifts with conditions are imposing your values on the receiver. There may not be anything wrong with this, but there are generally consequences from it.
One of our clients has chosen to reduce her lifestyle in retirement so that she can make regular gifts to her adult children. We had a family meeting where we talked about the strategy and we made three points — the money can be spent or saved in any way that the children want; the money will be gifted monthly with no advances on the gifts (so it is essentially a part of the children's budget), and the gifts will be made for the foreseeable future (but the commitment is not eternal). The children now have money that they can count on and the parent was clear that this is all that she will be able to give. Certainty was created for both parties.
It's only a gift if it is no longer yours. When couples manage their money, there often is a primary person following how it is being used. If the person tracking the money is also the one earning it, things can go sideways quickly. One strategy that we like to employ is have the person doing paid work fund money into an account for the nonwage earner. Since it is a couple, it is not technically a gift, but it works similarly. If the person who is financing the account is tracking where that money is spent, it defeats the purpose. The wage earner has more financial power than the non-earner; the only way to attempt to even the playing field is by setting aside some money that the other person has total autonomy over.