The disappointment for the Vikings and their fans of missing out by one game on a chance to not only play in a Super Bowl but do it in U.S. Bank Stadium is enough to leave oodles of regret this offseason.
The longer-lasting regret, though, might come from the recognition of how improbably — and nearly perfectly — 2017 aligned for the Vikings to have success, and how difficult that will be to duplicate.
The NFL is littered with examples of teams that made a big leaps from one year to the next — the Vikings went from eight victories to 13 between 2016 and 2017 — only to experience a natural regression the next season.
There are certainly some exceptions, including the almost always excellent Patriots who are going on nearly two decades of consistency and will face the Eagles in Minneapolis on Feb. 4.
But it will be difficult for the Vikings to win 13 games again next season for a variety of factors. Among them:
• The schedule gets a little tougher next year than it was this year. By virtue of winning its division, Minnesota will face other first-place teams next year (whereas last year the Vikings played other third-place finishers). The Vikings also only had seven true road games in 2017, getting to play the Browns in London in what was officially a home game for Cleveland.
The road slate looks particularly daunting in 2018: at Green Bay, Detroit, Chicago, Los Angeles Rams, Seattle, Philadelphia, New York Jets and New England. I see a lot of quality opponents there, and a lot of long trips to the coasts.
• The Vikings beat the Packers twice last year, with Aaron Rodgers missing most of the first game and all of the second because of his broken collarbone and its subsequent impact on the Packers' playoff chances. Assuming Rodgers is back to full health next year, sweeping Green Bay will become a far more daunting proposition.