MOUNTAIN IRON, MINN.
A plan hatched by three adjoining Iron Range school districts to build a new high school fell through more than a year ago after the boards in two of the districts backed out.
But though the idea fell through, it has generated a new discussion on the Range about how its small districts might work together — taking advantage of their unique position as beneficiaries of the surrounding mines — to build modern schools.
The combined school project would have served students from the Mountain Iron-Buhl, Virginia and Eveleth-Gilbert districts while providing a measure of autonomy for each — through independent sports teams, for instance.
Part of the idea was to build a joint, regional school while avoiding the kind of traditional consolidation that can sap the morale of communities that lose their schools. For a time, it appeared that the project might be eligible for money in a new fund, created from the taxes paid by taconite mining companies, for school districts that come up with creative proposals for working together.
"We felt, early on, that this joint school idea might be the signature project right out of the chute," said Mark Phillips, the commissioner of the Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation Board (IRRRB), which approves projects for the new taconite-derived funding. "But it didn't have grassroots support." The Virginia and Eveleth-Gilbert districts ultimately opted out.
The Legislature, hoping to spur innovation in aging Iron Range schools, created the school fund in 2014. The fund, which captures a sliver of the money generated by production and occupation taxes paid by the mines, currently has about $7.3 million, according to the IRRRB.
The agency plans to review the law this fall and begin writing guidelines for projects that will be eligible for funding — welcome news to superintendents and school board members who have been waiting for guidance.