'Involuntary' removal of St. Thomas from MIAC sets up awkward 2 years

The spare, two-paragraph news release from the MIAC announcing the departure of St. Thomas from the conference didn't provide a lot of details or elaboration.

But the 94-word release, advertised on the conference web site under the unassuming headline "MIAC announces conference membership change," provides three key points that allow for the mind to wander and expand a bit.

1) The words "involuntarily removed" in regards to St. Thomas' membership in the MIAC are key. It's a reiteration that St. Thomas didn't want this, and that the key drivers were other schools.

2 "The MIAC Presidents' Council cites athletic competitive parity in the conference as a primary concern" is telling.

Well, at least we don't have to guess about motivation any more. Maybe St. Thomas' undergraduate enrollment was also a factor — more students means more athletes which can contribute to that competitive parity.

But a bunch of schools in the conference were tired of losing to the Tommies at just about everything — especially football, and especially by lopsided scores like 97-0, which was the final when St. Thomas played St. Olaf in 2017. Like it or not, at least we know.

Competitively, St. Thomas and a lot of the rest of the MIAC are bad matches. The argument of St. Thomas supporters is that other schools should try to rise up to compete. The argument of detractors is that St. Thomas is winning a game that is rigged in its favor. I can see both sides.

This part is necessary with schedules already set and processes taking time. But this is the part where things could get really awkward and/or interesting depending on your point of view.

This means St. Thomas, which has been "involuntarily removed" — if you've ever been involuntarily removed from a bar, you realize it's a polite term for kicked out — will likely have two more full seasons of competing against MIAC schools, the large majority of whom orchestrated the Tommies' ouster for being too good or winning by too many points.

I have placed a figurative circle around Nov. 2, 2019 — the date St. Thomas is scheduled to travel to St. Olaf for a football game.

It's hard to get more lopsided than 97-0, but I'm not sure there's a point spread big enough if St. Thomas goes into that game especially angry about how all this went down.

The Tommies might publicly say all the right things. But with nothing to lose in the next two years, we'll see how ugly the wins get.