Most of the time when a fire truck rumbles out of a Minneapolis fire station, it's not going to a fire.
Only 4 percent of the Minneapolis Fire Department's 36,985 runs in 2012 involved running a water line to fight a fire in a house, commercial building, car, dumpster or a field. The rest of the time, firefighters were racing to a heart attack or some other medical emergency, a rescue, a hazardous condition or a false alarm.
The sharp decline in fires nationally — they are down 50 percent over the last decade in Minneapolis alone — has been credited to everything from better building codes to fewer people smoking. As the nature of firefighting jobs has changed, city officials across the country have begun looking at less costly alternatives to responding to medical and emergency calls.
In Minneapolis, next year's proposed $58.5 million budget for the city's Fire Department includes a $250,000 pilot program for an emergency-equipped SUV to handle medical calls in some parts of the city. If adopted, it would alter the department's bedrock practice of sending a fire truck out on every call, which is why both Fire Chief John Fruetel and union president Mark Lakosky are wary of the proposal.
"This is the tone I get fearful of," said Lakosky. "Don't reduce rigs and service."
The debate over next year's fire budget will fall to newly-elected Mayor Betsy Hodges, who as City Council budget chair had an acrimonious relationship with the firefighting union. Hodges didn't return a call for comment on this story.
Fruetel said he's not sure what the department will look like in the future, in part because new demands and opportunities brought by the federal Affordable Care Act are also complicating the picture.
"It's so hard to predict where it could go," Fruetel said this week.