In a blunt, brave and widely noted speech this month about race, cops and "hard truths," FBI Director James B. Comey said he was worried.
Comey told an audience at Georgetown University that he feared the "incredibly important and incredibly difficult conversation about race and policing" America has been having in recent months — following incendiary fatal encounters in Ferguson, Mo., and New York City — "has become focused entirely on the nature and character of law enforcement officers, when it should also be about something much harder to discuss."
"Debating the nature of policing is very important," Comey went on, "but I worry that it has become an excuse, at times, to avoid doing something harder."
Comey is right to worry about this, judging from much of the considerable media attention his speech received. Fulfilling his concerns, a lot of that coverage focused heavily — if not "entirely" — on Comey's frank admissions about racial bias influencing the conduct of cops. It often glossed over the "something harder" Comey had dared to name — the reason he believes cops have a racial bias.
"FBI director acknowledges 'hard truths' about racial bias in policing," read a typical headline in the Washington Post.
"FBI chief: Cops have race issue" read a front-page teaser in the Star Tribune.
The stories themselves, to varying degrees, noted Comey's broader themes. But the "news" that likely reached most Americans about Comey's address was simply that the FBI director had admitted that "some cynical officers view black men differently," as the Star Tribune's summary headline put it.
It's worth dwelling on the way Comey's speech was covered because it is such persuasive evidence that he is right — right to fret that a truly "open and honest discussion" of these issues is painfully difficult in America today. Even when a major public figure is reckless enough to discuss his view on the "something harder," much of the press finds it hard even to repeat plainly what he said.