Honda CR-V big on cargo room

Sometimes you need a bigger vehicle with more space. The Honda CR-V fits the bill.

September 18, 2008 at 3:19AM

The world of more-expensive gasoline is trying its level best to bring about the death of big sport-utility vehicles and pickup trucks. These are the mammoth haulers, the vehicles a brawny nation needs (or thinks it needs). Truth be told, when you load half a ton of stuff into a big wagon that already weighs nearly three tons, then hitch a speedboat to the back, you need a brawny engine to pull it all.

That burns gas. Lots of it. What to do? One thing is to scale back, which is something many of us seem to be doing. Park the Chevy Suburban and take the bus or train to work. Forgo the weekend water-skiing up at the lake because it could set you back more than $150 in fuel alone. But we still need to haul people and things, and that's where the smaller SUVs come in. I prefer to call them wagons, because that's what they are; they're just a bit taller than traditional station wagons.

The small wagons can easily post mid-20s numbers in the miles-per-gallon sweepstakes and still haul more than 70 cubic feet of cargo with the second row of seats down. At least, that's what we found with Honda's 2008 CR-V.

The CR-V has become a class-leading favorite in this pack of smaller haulers, a group populated by some stiff competition -- Edmunds.com lists 26 of them, including the Toyota RAV4, Ford Escape, Hyundai Tucson, Subaru Forester and Suzuki Grand Vitara -- and it's done so in a quiet way, given that it's been around, in various forms, since 1996.

The current incarnation, which emerged in the 2007 model year, is the kind of car where, if you look at it and its predecessors, you say, "They finally got it right." The first-generation CR-V was kind of a gawky-looking, underpowered thing. It was replaced in 2002 with a more substantial CR-V, but it looked as if the product planners redid the whole inside, then realized they still didn't have a place for the spare tire. So they stayed with the earlier design: The spare hangs outside the vehicle, attached to a side-opening tailgate. It wasn't an elegant solution.

Now, the spare tire is underneath the rear cargo platform where it belongs, and the whole redesign makes the CR-V a far better-looking, far smoother car, particularly for a station wagon. (They're high, they're bulky, they're meant to be practical.)

The CR-V comes in three trim levels -- LX, EX and EX-L, the L standing for leather. There's also an EX-L with navigation. You can get all-wheel-drive or front-wheel-drive. The test model I had was the most expensive -- the EX-L with navigation -- and my feeling was that if you're going to have one of these for 10 or 12 years, putting on maybe 150,000 miles, spring for the one with the goodies.

For years, I've thought navigation units were superfluous and too expensive -- you can buy a portable unit for much, much less, and you can move it from car to car.

But the built-in navis have large screens, and you don't have to worry as much about having them stolen.

And speaking of the CR-V's navigation unit, when the nav lady speaks, the volume on the audio system conveniently dips low and then recovers its full volume when Ms. Navi is done telling you to make that turn.

Inside, Honda has made this crossover car as comfortable as you can get, given it's still a utility vehicle, and it handles highways and smaller byways fine. But it's not an Accord, and you aren't going to get the smoother, less jouncy sedan ride that you might expect.

The dash is laid out logically, with the requisite tach and speedometer pods, and you also get such niceties as a bar meter that tells you what kind of mileage you're getting. (In a 950-mile trip, I averaged 25.6 miles per gallon, and I wasn't exactly lazing along. Try that in your Suburban.)

Honda could, however, take a page from Toyota's RAV4 playbook and give CR-V customers a choice of a four-cylinder or a V6. The CR-V has a 2.4-liter, 166-horsepower engine and it's, well, adequate to the task, but you do feel and hear that four-cylinder buzz when you hit that freeway on-ramp. The CR-V and RAV4 four-cylinder have identical (22 mpg) mileage figures in the new federal government calculations. The RAV4 V6 version, smoother and more powerful than the two four-bangers, suffers only 1 mpg by comparison.

A few other small nits on the CR-V: I liked the stiff panel over the cargo area, but thought it could be higher, at the level of the tops of the rear seats. As it is, you can slide a suitcase or two under it, but the space above is wasted, as the shelf is only rated for 20 pounds of cargo. Oddly enough, Honda sells a separate accessory, a retractable cargo cover that fits over the top part of the cargo area, but you have to go to the Honda parts counter and pony up $240 to get it.

But it's hard to find much fault with this little SUV. It has plenty of space for five people, it has Honda's vaunted reputation for reliability, and it's not going to break the piggy bank when it's time to fill the tank.

about the writer

about the writer

MICHAEL TAYLOR, SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE

More from Business

See More
card image
Alex Kormann/The Minnesota Star Tribune

The companies say deal will combine route networks to offer Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport to more mid-sized markets and vacation destinations.

card image