In the recent article "95% of Minnesotans now have health insurance," Gov. Mark Dayton stated: "People who have been knocking [MNsure] the whole time really now need to look at the facts. This has been tremendously successful and it's going to get better."
While we admire the governor's optimism, if he and executives from Minnesota's Obamacare website, MNsure, really believe this program will improve, it's time for transparency about what insurance premiums will cost Minnesota families and small businesses next year.
In 2013, Dayton's administration and insurance companies worked to release plan details a month before open enrollment. This gave people an idea of what to expect before shopping on MNsure, and consumers had three months to find, select and purchase a plan.
This year Minnesotans won't know the price of plans until MNsure's next enrollment period begins on Nov. 15. They'll have just four weeks to find a plan and complete enrollment.
State health and insurance officials agreed last year that a preview period was a positive step. Commerce Commissioner Mike Rothman said releasing rates early "increases transparency and allows individuals, families and small businesses more time to consider the options that will be available on MNsure." MNsure Chairman Brian Beutner said: "The sooner that you can get concrete information … out is going to allow people to actually make some decisions — as opposed to generalized information."
So why aren't the Dayton administration and MNsure pushing for an early rate release again this year?
It's possible that those who built MNsure are afraid voters will see how much their insurance costs are going up before the election.
DFL state leaders are touting that Minnesota has one of the lowest insurance exchange premium rates in the nation. But the number that matters is not what people are paying in Kentucky; it's what you paid last year, compared with what you're paying now or next year.