HARMONY, Minn. – In an empty, grassy lot bordered by cornfields stands a red sign: "Up to $12,000 CASH to Build in Harmony!"
This southeastern Minnesota city, population 1,020, wants you to live here. So much so that it will pay you $5,000 to $12,000 if you build a house.
Officials began the rebate after sorting the dozens of cities in the area's three counties by residents' median age and income. Tiny Harmony landed at the far ends of the 2013 data. Age: 51 years old, the highest. Household income: $32,985, the lowest.
After interviewing employers and families, officials learned that they were losing young professionals to other cities. The problem? Old homes that need work.
"The younger people coming here, they don't want to live in their grandmother's house," said Steve Cremer, president of Harmony Enterprises, which manufactures trash compactors and recycling equipment. Cremer estimates that 95 percent of his employees live outside of Harmony, in cities such as St. Charles, Rushford and Rochester.
Cities and counties, looking to boost property tax revenue, fill schools and rejuvenate Main Street businesses, have long tried creative ways to lure residents — with mixed results. In the 1980s, a few Minnesota towns gave away cash and groceries. Some have offered free residential lots to people who promise to build. This month, Watertown announced that to combat "sluggish new home starts," it would waive water, sewer and stormwater fees — a value of $9,500, the Carver County city said.
This new round of incentives speaks to small-town economic development officials' efforts to recruit people in addition to industry, sometimes family by family.
But some researchers say such carrots often don't work. Ben Winchester, a University of Minnesota Extension research fellow, studied housing incentives in a handful of Minnesota counties and found "they did not appear to make a significant difference," he said. Rather than attracting new residents, the programs were used mostly by people already living there.