The Lions and Vikings head into Sunday's game at TCF Bank Stadium scratching their helmets in disbelief over what happened in Week 1. The Lions blew a 21-3 lead in San Diego, giving up 404 yards passing in a 33-28 loss. As for the Vikings, about the only thing they did well was guess the coin toss. It was pretty much all downhill from their en route to a 20-3 loss at San Francisco.
How will each team respond Sunday? Are the Lions a shell of themselves defensively after losing leader and tone-setter Ndamukong Suh? Will Calvin Johnson be targeted more than four times and be more of a factor than he was in Week 1 (two catches, 39 yards)?
For some answers, we turned to Tim Twentyman, lead writer and insider for DetroitLions.com and former Detroit News beat writer.
MC: How much of Sunday's defensive collapse and league-worst 483 yards allowed is the end result of losing Ndamukong Suh to free agency, and what are the other defensive changes that have weakened this unit from last season, assuming of course that you think it is weaker?
TT: This defense is weaker. You don't lose the most dominant defensive tackle in the game and expect there won't to be an impact. That being said, I'm not sure how much Suh would have helped the Lions last week in San Diego. Philip Rivers picked the defense apart with a barrage of short passes and screens, 32 of his 42 passing attempts were under 10 yards. The problem the Lions defense had was rallying to the football, taking poor angles and tackling. Defensive coordinator Teryl Austin believes those issues are correctable. We'll see if he's right on Sunday. The Lions played that game in San Diego without their current best player on defense – linebacker DeAndre Levy. He's their best cover linebacker and an instinctive player in the run game. He's dealing with a hip injury and has missed practice all week so far. His status for Sunday is yet to be determined. Haloti Ngata played well in place of Suh, but they're different players. Ngata's game is predicated more on occupying space and blockers and allowing others to make plays around him. The defense is also trying to replace the six sacks DE George Johnson gave them last year (2.5 in two games vs. Minnesota). He left in free agency. The defense returns nine starters from the second-ranked unit from a year ago, but without Suh they are a little weaker. Without Suh and Levy they're a lot weaker.
MC: What happened to the Lions after they went ahead 21-3 on Sunday and what area do you think they're most vulnerable when they play the Vikings?
TT: They couldn't stay on the field on offense and couldn't get off of it on defense. The Lions were one of the best third-down defenses in the NFL last year, but San Diego converted over 50 percent on the money down in Week 1. To make matters worse, the offense was just 3-of-10 on third down. Most of those issues on third down on both sides of the ball came in the second half and helped the Chargers fight their way back into the game and eventual take the lead. The Lions ran just 47 plays on offense and had just 40 up until the last two-minute scoring drive. Where are the LIons vulnerable against the Vikings? The defense has to prove they can stop Minnesota's short and intermediate passing game. They were vulnerable in that area vs. the Chargers. The Vikings have no-doubt seen the film and could look to attack them in a similar fashion.
MC: A year ago, the Lions had 12 sacks and five interceptions in two wins over Teddy Bridgewater. Do they have the personnel to keep creating that much stress on a young quarterback?