DFL lawmakers looking for a way to cut through the media clutter started a "Minnesota Values Podcast" in February to champion their causes and rally supporters to their legislative agenda.
The Minnesota GOP, frequently critical of the mainstream media, responded in October with "Truth Matters," a podcast designed to give the Republican voting base "information straight from the source."
No longer willing to let others filter their political messages, candidates and elected officials are increasingly turning to podcasts and other social media platforms to communicate directly with voters.
"It seemed like a really good idea for me to be able to share my voice directly, as I want, to communicate with people," said Minnesota Republican Party Chairwoman Jennifer Carnahan.
While the technology is new, the impulse is centuries old.
First came Thomas Paine and the political pamphleteers of the Revolutionary era. The dawn of radio, a century-plus later, brought President Franklin D. Roosevelt's "fireside chats" into living rooms across the nation. In recent decades, the internet opened the floodgates for a steady stream of updates from politicians delivering their messages directly into e-mail inboxes and social media feeds.
Now, a growing number of politicians are turning to another increasingly popular media platform: podcasting, a communication medium providing narrative depth far beyond the 280-character limit of Twitter.
Streamable audio shows catapulted into the zeitgeist in 2015, thanks in large part to the hit investigative series "Serial." Today, hundreds of thousands of programs, on topics ranging from current events to sports to reality TV, are available at the tap of a phone screen. People are listening. Roughly half of Americans have tuned in at least once, up from 36% in 2016, according to Edison Research. The most popular shows, such as the New York Times' "The Daily," can rack up a billion downloads over time.