If you talk to pay-TV insiders and analysts, the buzz these days is about so-called skinny bundles. Fewer channels. Lower monthly costs.
Soon, even the thinnest bundles might be a thing of the past.
"Skinny bundles are simply a placeholder for a la carte," said Greg Ireland, an analyst at market researcher IDC. "Consumers really want a la carte, so it's hard to imagine we won't get there."
Some of the biggest names in broadcasting are experimenting with a la carte services abroad, where they are less beholden to the whims of cable and satellite companies.
In this country, the pay-TV industry has been insisting for years that a la carte is a nonstarter. It would cause the price of individual channels to skyrocket, industry executives have said, wiping out less-popular channels with relatively small audiences.
I suspect a new breed of programming entrepreneurs would emerge and find ways to thrive in this more competitive environment.
What a la carte would do is make pay-TV channels work a whole lot harder to attract and hang on to viewers. Seems like a surefire way to get better programming.
Nearly half of U.S. pay-TV subscribers would prefer a la carte channels, according to a recent survey by the accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers. Pay-TV subscribers are getting so fed up, about 20 percent say they will cut the cable cord this year.