After almost two years of community debate, Edina has approved a comprehensive plan update that rejects denser, more urban-style development as a way to rejuvenate the aging suburb filled with expensive single-family homes.
Dozens of public meetings, hard work by citizen volunteers and the guidance of a professional consultant steered Edina through one of the most deliberate and open comprehensive plan updates in the Twin Cities.
Yet, at the recent meeting where the City Council unanimously sent it on to the Metropolitan Council for review, the mood was decidedly sour, both among the council members and the audience.
A dozen residents came forward to castigate council members for reducing goals for affordable housing in the plan, which will help guide development in Edina for the next decade.
Before the council vote, Mayor Jim Hovland complained that the final plan "eviscerated" recommendations calling for more multi-story, affordable residential development, which he said was key to luring younger people into the city.
"To me, this plan does not reflect the majority opinion of this council. It is a document fashioned to satisfy the requirements of the Met Council," Hovland said. "It doesn't reflect my vision, frankly, and I don't think it reflects the vision of many other people in this town. It just reflects the vision of those who chose to show up."
But Council Member Joni Bennett said the plan, while a compromise, reflected the voice of residents she heard at meeting after meeting saying they did not want more high-rises in Edina. While most people did not oppose change, she said, "an overwhelming majority" wanted to make sure the city remained the place they moved to -- "not be an urban environment, a suburban environment."
The Met Council requires that city councils pass comprehensive plan updates by a "supermajority" -- in Edina's case, with at least four of five votes.