The push to pass a public works bill much earlier than usual could increase pressure on the state's cash flow problems, a state budget official said Tuesday.
Meanwhile, Gov. Tim Pawlenty renewed his threat to veto the entire bonding legislation proposed by DFLers, citing "misplaced priorities."
Public works projects are financed by bond sales that typically occur after the legislative session. DFLers want to pass a bonding bill early in the session to spark quicker job creation, but an early start could require borrowing from the general fund to finance projects until the proceeds from summer bond sales become available.
Early passage of a large bonding bill "could, depending on a number of factors, have a debilitating effect on the state's cash flow," said Katherine Kardell, assistant commissioner for treasury and debt management at Minnesota Management and Budget. She spoke before the Finance and Ways and Means committees of the Minnesota House.
However, Management and Budget Commissioner Tom Hanson has said that about 46 percent of the governor's $685 million bonding proposal involve maintenance and preservation projects that could be funded by revenue streams from previous bonding bills, and therefore suitable for fast-tracking.
A large portion of the $1 billion bonding bills proposed by the House and Senate would also appear to qualify for using the earlier bonding revenue stream to get started early.
Moreover, Rep. Alice Hausman, DFL-St. Paul, head of a House bonding panel, questioned whether selling bonds during the session would be a problem, citing an earlier occasion when it was done.
“The Pawlenty administration’s cash-flow crisis is not a reason to delay this bill. It is a problem to be solved,” Hausman said in a statement Tuesday.
Kardell's comments came as Gov. Tim Pawlenty expressed concern Tuesday about the overall size and "misplaced priorities" in the legislative bonding bills expected to be approved during the next couple of weeks. He repeated a threat he made last month to veto the bonding legislation in its entirely, rather than line-item veto specific projects.
He was particularly annoyed that the bills did not include money to expand the sex offender treatment program at Moose Lake. Pawlenty has proposed $89 million to double the number of beds there.
Noting the absence of money for Moose Lake, Pawlenty added, "Yet they have money to fund an art...facility in Chatfield. They have money to do convention centers all over the state."
The Senate was expected to take up its version of the bonding bill today.
More from Star Tribune
More from Hot Dish Politics
Amid reports that Donald Trump was in danger of not getting on Minnesota's presidential ballot, the Trump campaign says everything is in order and voters will have a chance to cast their ballot for him in November.
The Minnesota Jobs Coalition, a Republican allied political group, has alleged violations of campaign-finance law by a DFL House candidate and a former DFL state legislator.
Liberal group plunks $350k for ads in Duluth against Mills
Gov. Mark Dayton has scheduled a public meeting Thursday to discuss the future of the proposed Southwest Light Rail line.
Interest groups spent less slightly money lobbying state government in 2015 than in the previous year, according to a report released Wednesday by the Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board.
Recommended For You
State Supreme Court ruling on Minneapolis issue could open door to other campaigns.
The Vikings and their fans stepped into U.S. Bank Stadium and history Sunday for the team's first preseason home game at the new $1.1 billion digs in downtown.
The appearance of conflict of interest is both troubling and inevitable.
Anthony Weiner’s Twitter account appears to be deleted after new sexting allegations about Hillary Clinton adviser Huma Abedin’s husband grace the cover of Monday’s
With the hourglass running out for his administration, President Barack Obama's health care law is struggling in many parts of the country. Double-digit premium increases and exits by big-name insurers have caused some to wonder whether "Obamacare" will go down as a failed experiment.