The Senate Intelligence Committee's report on how the CIA interrogated al-Qaida detainees provides eight "primary" examples in which the agency said it obtained good intelligence as a result of what it called "enhanced interrogation techniques," and the Senate panel's conclusions that the information was available elsewhere and without resorting to brutal questioning.
A look at those examples of the CIA's claims and the Senate's counterclaims, according to the Senate report:
JOSE PADILLA
THE CIA SAID Padilla, a U.S. citizen, was implicated in the so-called Dirty Bomb/Tall Buildings plotting. Terror leader Khalid Sheikh Mohammed tasked Padilla in 2002 with conducting an operation using natural gas to blow up tall buildings in the United States. Over the next few years, the CIA cited the capture of Padilla before he could pull off such a plot as a prime example of how "key intelligence collected from (high value detainee) interrogations after applying interrogation techniques" had "enabled CIA to disrupt terrorist plots" and "capture additional terrorists." It also said the information was otherwise unavailable and saved lives.
THE SENATE REPORT SAYS the CIA first received reporting on the threat posed by Padilla from a foreign government. Eight days later, al-Qaida operative Abu Zubaydah gave the FBI information on the plot without names, four months before the CIA began using its harsh interrogation techniques on Zubaydah, and after the intelligence community had concluded that Padilla's plots were infeasible.
THE KARACHI PLOTS
THE CIA SAID in November 2007 talking points to the CIA director that it disrupted a plan to conduct attacks against the U.S. consulate and other U.S. interests in Pakistan "after applying the waterboard along with other interrogation techniques." It said the plot was uncovered during the initial interrogations of Khallad Bin Attash and Ammar al-Baluchi and later confirmed by Mohammed. A CIA briefing prepared for Vice President Dick Cheney in March 2005 under the heading "Interrogation Results" also said "use of DOJ-authorized enhanced interrogation techniques ... has enabled us to disrupt terrorist plots, capture additional terrorists (including) the Karachi Plot." In its written response to the Senate's report on Tuesday, the CIA said it should have said it "revealed ongoing attack plotting against the U.S. official presence in Karachi that prompted the consulate to take further steps to protect its officers."
THE SENATE REPORT SAYS the Karachi Plot was disrupted with the confiscation of explosives and the arrests of al-Baluchi and bin Attash in April 2003. The operation and arrests were conducted unilaterally by Pakistani authorities and were unrelated to any reporting from the CIA's Detention and Interrogation Program. At the time of their arrest, the plot leaders were far from being ready to carry out the attack.