Candidates, political parties and their allies dumped more than $30 million as they fought a brutal campaign for control of state government, according to final 2016 campaign finance reports released Wednesday.
The two sides spent nearly two-thirds of the money on just 26 districts — 16 in the House and 10 in the Senate, according to a Star Tribune analysis.
At least two races saw $1 million spent for the general election, while three others cleared $900,000. The most expensive race was a Senate fight in the western suburbs that saw Sen. Paul Anderson, R-Plymouth, defeat DFLer Deb Calvert. Republicans won four of the five races that topped $900,000.
The DFL outspent Republicans in the House and especially the Senate, where the difference was significant. Despite that, Republicans had a net pickup of six seats in the Senate, giving them a narrow one-seat majority.
The House GOP — already in the majority — strengthened its hold on the lower chamber, extending its advantage to 76-57, despite being outspent by the DFL and its allies.
For DFL operatives, the new reports are wince-inducing because of the huge sums spent on what turned out to be lost causes.
The DFL Senate caucus raised more than $4 million. The House DFL caucus also raised nearly $4 million. Much of the caucus money was spent by the state party, which spent nearly $10 million on the campaign, including a sophisticated voter identification and turnout operation that was overwhelmed by support — especially in greater Minnesota — for President Donald Trump and his fellow Republicans down the ballot.
The Republican Party of Minnesota, still mired in debt after financial problems that extend back years, spent just $840,000. Via the GOP House and Senate caucuses, however, Republicans held their own on the money front. Speaker Kurt Daudt, R-Crown, seen as an early GOP front-runner in the 2018 governor's race, showed he is a competent fundraiser, as the House Republican caucus spent more than $2.9 million to defend and ultimately expand their majority.