A U.S. Supreme Court decision that supporters hoped would level the playing field for small retailers against online-only competitors, while also adding millions to state coffers, hasn't panned out as expected. At least not so far.
The high court's ruling in South Dakota v. Wayfair in June 2018 paved the way for states, including Minnesota, to reverse long-standing precedence and collect sales taxes from sellers that have no physical presence. Sales taxes are the state's second largest source of revenue after individual income taxes.
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) projected that Minnesota could see a potential gain of $132 million more each year as a result of the ruling.
But the expected online sales-tax boon has yet to materialize in Minnesota or other northern-tier states, a new report from the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis asserts.
And consumers continue to choose online shopping over malls and Main Street mom-and-pops.
"Tax statistics boldly confirm that people are shopping with their clicks, not their feet, … the continuation of a deepening and disappointing trend for many local stores and malls," the report said.
The report examined the most recent data on taxable sales in the Federal Reserve's Ninth District — Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, northwestern Wisconsin and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan.
Minnesota's law took effect October 2018, opening the way for it to collect taxes from online giants such as Amazon, Overstock, eBay and Zappos as well as mail-order companies.