Maybe it's the book sales. Maybe it's the national press. Maybe they really do think they're just "born for it." Whatever the allure of running for president is this year, about two dozen Democrats are giving it a shot.
The fact that only about five of them have a legitimate chance of winning the nomination has left several hopefuls from purple states getting criticized for wasting a perfectly good chance to knock off an incumbent Republican senator and flip the Senate to the Democrats in the process.
"Beto should run against Sen. John Cornyn in Texas."
"Former Gov. John Hickenlooper should challenge Sen. Cory Gardner in Colorado."
You get the picture.
But criticizing those men for not wanting to join the U.S. Senate gets today's reality of governance in America all wrong.
Yes, Hickenlooper, Beto O'Rourke and everybody else polling around 5% or below probably should run for the Senate — but they should run for the state Senate. They could also run for the state House.
If they and the rest of the candidates really want to make a mark on policy in America, if they really want to change people's lives, there are 50 capitals where they'd be guaranteed to do that in 2020. Not in Washington, D.C.