After 113-plus comments and 27,658 votes the result is in, and it is definitive: Twins first baseman Joe Mauer is not a Hall-of-Famer.

So: No soup for youyou are the weakest link; and better luck next year.

That, at least, according to non-scientific Twitter poll crafted by Dallas Morning News Rangers reporter Evan Grant over the weekend while the Rangers were in town to play the Twins.

Sixty-three percent of respondents voted against Mauer’s candidacy, citing many of the familiar lines heard round Minnesota:

 

“It’s a good career—just not a hall of fame career. Certainly, he’s a Twins hall of famer—not Cooperstown.” -@bryandolgin

“If he was a catcher longer and played at that level the whole time then certainly.” -@AshleyJeramy2

“Let’s just say that if you sign a $20 mil (or thereabouts) per year contract and it’s almost universally agreed that your team regrets signing you to that then you’re not a Hall of Famer (or even in the discussion).” -@HBKevin91581

“He was a HOF catcher and a below average 1B.” -@titosaysfu

 

That’s not to say Mauer didn’t have his backers – 37 percent thought he was worthy:

“3 batting titles and MVP as a multiple gold glove Catcher. it not for concussions he is greatest catcher ever perhaps, YES YES YES he is HOF.” -@therotowhiz

“If he's not, then it's basically impossible for a catcher to go in.” -@uofmike

“Yes, because of what he accomplished as a catcher.” -@tylermelroe

And, as is always the case with Twitter, there were the questionable takes:

“Never was a difference maker !” -@ronSchulz2 (He’s right: MVP-winners usually aren’t.)

“Mauer might be first ballot for taking the Twins out of obscurity when he came in.” -@dudedonnie (Mauer’s MLB career began in 2004, and the Twins were coming off two consecutive playoff appearances.)

“Should have stayed behind the plate. That was a bad career decision.” -@democratcirca71 (Guess the thought here is you can make impact your team from the DL?)

 

But there is also this caveat: Grant put “No” ahead of “Yes,” which tripped up a few participants:

“Who puts No first?” -@bill_style

“You gotta put yes on top! I voted no :/” -@andy_hawe

“Why’d you flip yes and no. I demand a recount.” -@snagholorelite

 

ERRONEOUS!

Let the conspiracy theories begin.

Or then again, maybe there is a simpler explanation for why "No" was listed ahead of "Yes." 

Older Post

'Fantasy Footballers Podcast' all in on Kirk Cousins

Newer Post

Lynx win weekend battle of sharp elbows on social media