Court of Appeals rules in favor of care assistants
December 17, 2012 — 7:15pm
The Minnesota State Court of Appeals said Monday it is unconstitutional for the state to pay less for in-home care when the provider is related to the person receiving the care.
At issue is a 2011 amendment that reduced the pay of personal care assistants who are related to those receiving the care by 20 percent, relative to unrelated providers. According to the Service Employees International Union, which is seeking to organize care assistants, the reduction was blocked by the court battle and delayed by the Legislature.
The appeals court ruled that treating the two groups differently -- related and unrelated care providers -- violates the state Constitution. The decision said the Legislature's action "creates arbitrary distinctions between relative and nonrelative personal care attendants ... and therefore is unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Minnesota Constitution."
Interest groups spent less slightly money lobbying state government in 2015 than in the previous year, according to a report released Wednesday by the Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board.
More than half the people outside the government who met with Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state gave money — either personally or through companies or groups — to the Clinton Foundation. It's an extraordinary proportion indicating her possible ethics challenges if elected president.