A century ago President Woodrow Wilson muscled his way onto the world stage to help divvy-up scraps of the Ottoman Empire while proclaiming the right of self-determination for all peoples.
Except brown peoples like Syrians, who were obviously unqualified for self-rule. Or Russian peoples, who, in the course of human events, had revolted against a monarchy and "self-determined" a try at communism. Wilson sent 13,000 U.S. troops to Siberia in 1918 to kill revolutionaries, trying to make the world safe for hereditary autocracy.
The current war in Syria is only the latest ugly chapter in this story.
John Rash thinks otherwise ("The world fails to save Syria's citizens," Oct. 26). The war in Syria is the fault of those "murderous," "merciless," "homicidal" Assads.
Never mind that President Dwight Eisenhower and British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan greenlighted an (ultimately unsuccessful) CIA/MI-6 plot to murder Syrian leaders in 1957 because they might lean communist. And never mind the U.S. and British overthrow of Mossadegh of Iran in 1953, plus multiple attempts to murder Egypt's Gamal Abdel Nasser.
Never mind that Syria, as noted by William Blum in his book "Killing Hope," just wanted to be left alone: "Syria was not behaving like Washington thought a Third World government should. For one thing, it was the only state in the area to refuse all U.S. economic or military assistance."
Never mind that after adoption of its first socialist, secular constitution in 1973, Syrian civilians were targets of terrorist attacks from 1976 to 1982 by members of the Muslim Brotherhood, who wanted religious rule. When Hafez al-Assad ended the attacks by attacking the city of Hama, with high civilian casualties, he was labeled a butcher of his own people by the United States.
Sound familiar?