After Thursday's testimony from James Comey, there's finally consensus regarding the president.
No, not the one in Washington. The one in Moscow.
Partisans, after all, interpreted the Senate Intelligence Committee hearing through predictable prisms: Some Republicans found Comey's comments exculpatory, while some Democrats found the former FBI director's descriptions of his meetings with President Donald Trump as proof of obstruction of justice.
Rather, there's consensus on President Vladimir Putin, who leads a Russian government that interfered in the 2016 election, a fact unequivocally confirmed by Comey.
Coming to consensus on the Kremlin can hopefully result in Congress coming to consensus on the Russia probe, too.
Because despite the divides in the Beltway and beyond, Russia's attack on our democracy is an attack on America. And there is no constituency for a foreign government — particularly one as adversarial and amoral as Moscow's — manipulating our democratic process.
"This investigation is not about relitigating the election," said Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va. "It's not about who won or lost. And it sure as heck is not about Democrats vs. Republicans. We are here because a foreign adversary attacked us right here at home, plain and simple. Not by guns or missiles, but by foreign operatives seeking to hijack our most important democratic process: our presidential election."
North Carolina Republican Richard Burr, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, also sought to establish the extent of Russian involvement. Burr asked Comey if he had any doubts if Russia attempted to interfere in the election, whether it was behind the computer intrusions and subsequent leaks of Democratic entities' e-mails, and whether it was behind cyberintrusion of state voter files.