Earlier this year shareholders of a fast-growing medical device company in Minnetonka were greeted with letters warning that a disgruntled board member with a large financial stake was trying to wrest control through a proxy fight that could leave the company irreparably damaged.
That board member, New Yorker Lewis C. Pell, has since won control at Cogentix Medical. Pell's allies now control the board, while his rivals, including the now-former CEO and two board members, are out. And shareholders of the Minnetonka-based med-tech company are left to wonder what they have in their portfolios, especially given last week's warning that gaps on the board could trigger a Nasdaq delisting.
"It's a bloody shame," said Wayzata money manager Richard W. Perkins, a longtime investor in Cogentix's predecessor company, Uroplasty. "This guy [Pell] was not about to give up. … The company has a new president and new board of directors, and we'll just have to see what happens."
Cogentix sells urology and endoscope technology, mainly to doctor's offices. The company was formed last year through the merger of two long-running med-tech microcaps: Minnetonka's Uroplasty, run by board chairman and CEO Rob Kill; and New Jersey's Vision-Sciences, where Pell was co-founder and chairman. The combined company is incorporated in Delaware and headquartered in Minnetonka.
In February, Pell aired concerns about executive pay, unsatisfactory performance and "empty vision" by Cogentix management and soon launched a proxy contest asking shareholders at the annual meeting in May to vote Kill and his allies off the board. Pell announced a slate of directors, including himself, who would oppose Kill and create a new majority.
Kill's allies were loath to work with Pell, who had been reprimanded by Cogentix's audit committee shortly after the deal closed for reportedly threatening to have Kill fired, court records say. In an e-mail later cited in a court ruling, nominating committee chairman Kevin Roche wrote that he would support Kill and never give in to "Trump-like bullying" from Pell.
Roche and his allies formed a plan to reduce the size of the board. Though presented as an efficiency move, the plan would have had the effect of giving shareholders a say over just one seat on the board in the May voting, instead of three. Pell sued to stop it, and won, after a Delaware judge found that reducing the seats up for election undermined shareholder democracy. Neither Pell nor Roche could be reached for comment through their attorneys.
Pell's lawsuit was resolved through a legal settlement guaranteeing that Kill and his allies would leave the board and not stand for re-election, and that a new CEO would be installed. Shareholders approved Pell's slate of three candidates at the May 24 meeting. About 30 percent of the proxy votes for Pell were withheld.