The U.S. House is on a pace to finalize a contentious Commerce and Justice Department spending bill today full of GOP cost-cutting amendments, including one by Minnesota Republican Chip Cravaack eliminating funds for climate change education programs.
Cravaack positioned it Wednesday as an effort to eliminate duplicative global warming programs. Democrats waxed skeptical, casting it as part of an effort to deny climate change science.
Cravaack’s Washington spokesman, Michael Bars, declined to answer questions about Cravaack’s position on global warming.
But it turns out that Cravaack has gone public with his views on climate change before. In a March, 2010 interview with conservative Twin Cities radio talk show host Sue Jeffers, then-candidate Cravaack was asked about his views on global warming.
He replied, “One word, bunk. It’s built off of corrupt data and a corrupt NASA program. It’s bunk. It’s fallacy. There is absolutely no substantial evidence to prove that there is global warming.”
His comments on global warming can be heard at minute 7:25 in this clip:
More from Star Tribune
More from Hot Dish Politics
Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders will visit Minnesota next week to campaign for Democratic nominee.
Reps. Kline, McCollum, Ellison vote against veto override on 9/11 bill
The Washington, D.C.-based think tank published a ranking of states' business tax competitiveness.
Rep. Keith Ellison, former Bernie supporter, to spin for Clinton at debate
Sen. Klobuchar raps to "Hamilton" producer, requests show go to MN
Recommended For You
Plunging deeper into campaign controversy, Donald Trump publicly shamed a former beauty queen on Friday for her "disgusting" sexual past and then — in one of presidential history's more bizarre moments — encouraged Americans to watch a "sex tape" he said would support his case.
Readers Write (Oct. 1): Ryder Cup, Allina nurses' strike, Trump and taxes, campaign finance update, guns and terror
Really, you must see things to believe them.
They broke their team record with their 103rd loss of the year.
Trump's debate prep sessions included discussions about using the attack as a response if Hillary Clinton discussed the Republican nominee's treatment of women over the years
Trump's platform and argumentative style leads a Democrat to rethink the nature of political disagreement.