If the Pohlads decide not to spend big this season, they will have logic on their side.
A new wave of analytical general managers has determined that playing the free-agent market is as foolish as playing roulette while drunk. Analysts can prove to owners that free agency is overrated, and if you are an owner and your most important employees tell you to save your money, you're probably going to save your money.
Usually, spending money on expensive free agents is like giving your wife flowers. They make an immediate impression, and after a short time you're left with the equivalent of dead weeds.
A quick trip through Twins or Major League Baseball history teaches a recurring lesson: Most big contracts don't produce desired results, either because the player fails, the player is injured or the player doesn't elevate the franchise.
Just as most mega-contracts wind up becoming unhelpful or downright injurious to the franchise, most teams that "win" the hot stove season by signing free agents usually face-plant during the actual season. There are many reasons for this.
The teams eager to spend the most usually are trying to mask flaws on their major-league roster and in their farm system. In baseball, one or two players can't make up for a bad roster.
Most years, the free agents themselves are trying to get rewarded for what they have done without any guarantee that they will continue to produce.
So there are two fatal flaws in free agency: Only the highest bidder gets the player, meaning the player is by definition paid much more than his median perceived value; and the team paying that price is rewarding what the player did for his previous team.