Advertisement

Boeing to offer stopgap solution to get 787 back in the air

Sources say redesign of battery system wouldn't get Dreamliners flying until May at the earliest.

February 19, 2013 at 4:34AM
This Jan. 31, 2013 photo provided by the Japan Transport Safety Board shows two of eight damaged cells in the battery, that overheated on the All Nippon Airways Boeing 787 on Jan. 16 and prompted an emergency landing, during an investigation by U.S. and Japanese aviation safety regulators at its manufacturer GS Yuasa's headquarters in Kyoto, Japan. An investigation into the battery found evidence of the same type of "thermal runaway" seen in a similar incident in Boston, officials said Tuesday,
This Jan. 31 photo provided by the Japan Transport Safety Board shows two of eight damaged battery cells in an All Nippon Airways Boeing 787. (The Minnesota Star Tribune)

SEATTLE – Boeing Co. will propose to regulators as early as this week a short-term fix to bolster the 787's defenses in case of battery fires like those that have kept the jets grounded for the past month.

The goal is to get the planes flying passengers again, according to multiple sources with knowledge of the matter, while Boeing works on a comprehensive redesign of the lithium-ion battery system that could take nine months or more to implement.

The interim fix includes a heavy-duty titanium or steel containment box around the battery cells, and high-pressure tubes that, in the event of a battery fire, would vent any gases directly to the outside of the jet.

Boeing's approach acknowledges that four weeks after two batteries overheated — one catching fire on the ground, the other smoldering in flight — investigators haven't pinpointed the cause.

That leaves Boeing little choice for now but to engineer a workaround that will better contain any such incident and protect the airplane.

But it's unclear if the FAA is ready yet to accept containment of an overheated battery rather than prevention.

"We're not there yet," said a government official with knowledge of the ongoing discussions, who asked for anonymity. "It wouldn't surprise me if we're still talking weeks [from now] before everyone is comfortable" with the workaround that Boeing is suggesting.

Even if the FAA agrees, the short-term fix will take at least three months to design, test, certify and retrofit, said an Everett, Wash., source who knows details of Boeing's proposed solutions.

Advertisement
Advertisement

That would mean the earliest the Dreamliners could fly passengers again would be May. If it's much longer than that, assembly of the jets in Everett, a Seattle suburb, will probably have to be slowed and Boeing's plan to ramp up production and deliveries will be severely disrupted, he said.

"This cannot drag out for six to nine months, from a financial standpoint. Think about nine months of airplanes just sitting there," said the Everett source. "This is a gut-wrenching issue."

Boeing will not disclose any details of the solutions it is working on.

But company spokesman Marc Birtel said, "Boeing is confident in the safety and reliability of lithium-ion batteries," and "good progress is being made" in resolving the battery problem.

But aviation experts are increasingly worried.

Adam Pilarski of consulting firm Avitas warns that though Wall Street accepts Boeing's optimism that the 787 grounding will be relatively short, the forgiving attitude may not last.

Advertisement

"Boeing is trying to play it down to some degree, hopeful the solution is just around the corner," said Pilarski. "But it may take much longer. And it could have a significant financial impact."

Advertisement
about the writer

about the writer

Dominic Gates, Seattle Times

More from Business

See More
card image

Officials from the state Department of Employment and Economic Development said they’re keeping a close eye on how federal policy hits the local job market.

Advertisement
Advertisement

To leave a comment, .

Advertisement