Dr. Karen Margolis hasn't had to face patients since her study weakened the argument in favor of daily aspirin to prevent cardiovascular disease, but she has had to face her husband, and her father.
"Both are taking aspirin because I recommended it, once upon a time," she said.
Aspirin has been a top topic all week — in clinics, living rooms and offices — because three studies challenged the guidance for certain older adults taking it daily.
The latest study, known as ASPREE, followed 15,000 healthy adults ages 70 and older over five years. It found that those taking aspirin had no greater protection from disabilities or heart attacks but did have higher drug-related risks of internal bleeding.
Margolis and Bloomington-based HealthPartners enrolled 250 adults. Minneapolis-based Hennepin Healthcare led the U.S. arm of the study, which was based in Australia.
Dr. Anne Murray, the Hennepin geriatrician who led the research, has been flooded with questions about her results: "It's been a combination of patients and colleagues, some of whom are taking aspirin themselves."
Many aspirin users will be unaffected. The study examined "primary prevention" in people who haven't had cardiovascular events. It has no bearing on aspirin usage for people who have already suffered events such as heart attacks. The study also only examined aspirin usage in people 70 or older, for whom there was no concrete evidence of benefit anyway.
One of the other new studies examined aspirin usage in people 55 and older at elevated risk of heart problems. Murray said its results weren't conclusive enough to overturn current aspirin guidance.