A clash appears to be brewing between legislators and the Department of Natural Resources over details of a wolf hunting season next fall.
At Capitol hearings last week, some legislators questioned whether the DNR's proposed first-ever wolf season is too conservative. And they raised doubts whether they will accept the agency's intention of starting the wolf season at the end of November -- after the regular firearms deer season.
"I'd like to see the deer hunters have a better opportunity [at a wolf]," said Sen. Bill Ingebrigtsen, R-Alexandria, chairman of the Environment and Natural Resources Committee.
Sen. Paul Gazelka, R-Baxter, also said he was hoping to see a wolf season run concurrent with the deer season.
"I think you'd have a lot more people interested," he told DNR officials.
At a House hearing, Rep. David Dill, DFL-Crane Lake, said: "I think there will be a great backlash to starting it [the wolf season] later. There's a pent-up demand."
DNR officials told legislators that they deliberately are taking a conservative approach to a wolf season to gauge hunter and trapper interest and success rates. They proposed a quota of 400 wolves, with 6,000 hunting and trapping licenses issued through a lottery. Hunters or trappers could take one wolf with a license. The DNR says the taking of 400 wolves by hunters and trappers wouldn't reduce the wolf population, because other animals would replace those killed. (For details on the DNR's proposal, see www.startribune.com/outdoors.)
Fear of lawsuit Officials said they don't want to do anything that would jeopardize state control and lead to the wolf being placed back on the protected list under the Endangered Species Act. After years of lawsuits, the iconic animal officially went off the list and under state control on Friday.