Advertisement

A curious ruling in favor of pipeline

Administrative judge dismisses the threat Enbridge project poses in northern Minnesota.

June 13, 2014 at 11:39PM

The June 13 article "Pipeline upgrade endorsed" cites state Administrative Law Judge Eric Lipman's findings on the contested case in which the Sierra Club and MN350 resist the proposed expansion of Enbridge's Alberta Clipper pipeline.

Lipman's order conveys the mistaken impression that those who were able to testify at the April 3 hearing on this case in St. Paul " … represented a good cross-section of the views on the project …" Of the approximately 1,000 people who sought recognition to speak, only 58 were granted the opportunity to do so. The majority of the larger group had intended to speak in opposition to the expansion, reflecting the reluctance of the people of Minnesota to have additional flows of toxic tar sands crude oil traversing their state.

In his report, Lipman acknowledges the intervenors' and public commentators' claim that conveying increased tar sands " … will be catastrophic to the natural environment; perhaps imperiling human civilization." But he tells us that it won't be Enbridge's fault. "Attributing all of the greenhouse gas impacts from the oil that Enbridge transports, to the project, is problematic. … [Enbridge] does not extract or refine the oil that it transports." My question: Why is a delivery company not responsible for the material it delivers, and not culpable if damage to the public or the environment occurs?

Section 7853 of the Minnesota Administrative Rules requires consideration of how the pipeline would affect the natural and socioeconomic environments. In that connection, Lipman states that the impact "near" the pipeline would be "temporary and modest." Is the judge telling us that the people of Minnesota would have to be living on the pipeline to be adversely impacted? That their water, their air, their climate and their future will not be compromised if they live elsewhere?

Stan Sattinger lives in Minneapolis.
Advertisement
about the writer

about the writer

STAN SATTINGER

More from Commentaries

See More
Leslie Fhima for the Golden Bachelor

Similar to “Bachelor in Paradise,” and the Bachelor universe in general, there was a long list of unwritten rules, especially to get into the front row.

Photo made at Dayton, Tennessee, shows Clarence Darrow (left), the most famous criminal lawyer of his time, and William Jennings Bryan (right), noted lawyer & popular politician. They were rivals in the Scopes "Monkey" trial, about teaching evolution in schools, Darrow for the defense, Bryan for the prosecution.
Jenna Ortega as Wednesday Addams in Wednesday.
Advertisement
Advertisement

To leave a comment, .

Advertisement