Re: Doug Nelson's letter last Sunday about the Guthrie Theater's "Peer Gynt"
Write on: Response to Riemenschneider, Doug Nelson
I fear Mr. Nelson's letter might give readers an unfair view of live theater in general and this production specifically. The performance he criticized was the first preview, a week before the show opened. Preview performances are part of the rehearsal process, and have a lower ticket price to reflect that the show is still a work in progress. With new scripts such as "Peer Gynt," the week of previews is a time to see what works in front of an audience and make potentially major changes.
I was particularly upset that Mr. Nelson's letter denigrated the work of an understudy who gave a heroic performance as the Troll King. Typically, understudies at the Guthrie are hired less than a week before the first preview. They watch tech rehearsals and attend previews, but do not rehearse until the show has opened. On Jan. 11 -- the day before the first preview of "Peer Gynt" -- one of the actors became ill. The company spent several hours Saturday afternoon doing a "put-in" rehearsal for the understudy, running all the scenes in which he appeared. Then they did their first and only run-through of the show prior to having an audience.
Of course the understudy carried pages from the script during the preview -- he had had less than 24 hours to learn what the rest of the cast had been working on for a month. This actor's skill and professionalism under pressure were remarkable, and the changes and refinements made during the following week by director Tim Carroll, playwright Robert Bly and the cast and crew of "Peer Gynt" were nothing less than astonishing. I hope this provides a little insight into the process of live theater.
MELODIE BAHAN, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS, GUTHRIE THEATER
Re: Chris Riemenschneider's obituary for the CD
R.I.P. the CD? Not yet, anyway. Sure, I can read the writing on the wall. CD sales are decreasing as online procurement of music (legitimate and not) is increasing. I suspect we may be only a few years away from the time when CDs are unavailable at "brick and mortar" stores. That, however, doesn't mean the format is dead. I suspect that the Internet sales of CDs will maintain the viability of the format for several more years.
In the meantime, I don't appreciate the rhetorical "shove into the grave" that your article provided. And although you mentioned it, I'd appreciate a bit more emphasis on the "CDs do sound better." MP3 files, played over a good stereo system, are harsh and lifeless compared with a well-recorded CD.
STEVE HAUSER EAGAN
I think you're being a bit overdramatic. True, the CD will lose more and more popularity, but I cannot imagine it ever completely going away, or fading away as much as vinyl. I'm 21, and I will never buy a download when I can get it for free. I am an ardent supporter of physical media. You also failed to mention the three biggest advantages of CDs: You can rip the CD in any format you desire, you can resell it at any time when you grow bored with it (try that with MP3s!), and you can buy pretty much any CD used for cheaper than the MP3 download.
JON WESTMARK MINNETONKA
Your R.I.P. article on CDs was one of the best things written in the paper in a long time. It had good satirical humor and actually looked at some real problems in the music industry. One note of correction, MP3s are always compressed, not just sometimes as you stated; but you are forgiven. Thanks for a good bit of humor this morning.
ROBERT LUNDE RAMSEY
Whether you agree or not with our critics' reviews, send your comments to write@startribune.com.