Without affirmative action, elite colleges are prioritizing economic diversity in admissions

WASHINGTON — Some of the country's most prestigious colleges are enrolling record numbers of low-income students — a growing admissions priority in the absence of affirmative action.

America's top campuses remain crowded with wealth, but some universities have accelerated efforts to reach a wider swath of the country, recruiting more in urban and rural areas and offering free tuition for students whose families are not among the highest earners.

The strategy could lead to friction with the federal government. The Trump administration, which has pulled funding from elite colleges over a range of grievances, has suggested it's illegal to target needier students. College leaders believe they're on solid legal ground.

At Princeton University, this year's freshman class has more low-income students than ever. One in four are eligible for federal Pell grants, which are scholarships reserved for students with the most significant financial need. That's a leap from two decades ago, when fewer than 1 in 10 were eligible.

''The only way to increase socioeconomic diversity is to be intentional about it," Princeton President Christopher Eisgruber said in a statement. ''Socioeconomic diversity will increase if and only if college presidents make it a priority.''

Last year, Princeton set aggressive goals to recruit more low-income students in the wake of the Supreme Court's ban on affirmative action in higher education. Without the ability to consider race, officials wrote in a campus report, focusing on economic diversity offers ''the university's greatest opportunity to attract diverse talent."

The country's most selective colleges still enroll large proportions of students from the wealthiest 1% of American families. Many of those campuses have tried for years to shed reputations of elitism, with only gradual changes in enrollment.

Only a small fraction of the nation's colleges have publicly disclosed their low-income enrollments this year, and national data won't be released by the federal government until next year. But early numbers show a trend.

At 17 highly selective colleges that have released new data, almost all saw increases in Pell-eligible students between 2023 and this year, according to an Associated Press analysis. Most saw increases in consecutive years, and none saw a significant decrease in aggregate over the two years.

Yale, Duke, Johns Hopkins and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology all have set enrollment records for Pell-eligible students in the past two years.

Part of the uptick owes to a federal expansion that made more students eligible for Pell grants last year. But campus leaders also believe the increases reflect their own efforts.

The numbers in MIT's freshman class have climbed by 43% over the past two years, and low-income students account for more than a quarter of this year's class. MIT officials cited its policy providing free tuition for families that earn less than $200,000 a year.

Nationwide, roughly a third of undergraduate students have received Pell grants in recent years.

Two years ago, Amherst College in Massachusetts made tuition free for students in the bottom 80% of U.S. earnings. It also started covering meals and housing for those below the median income, and it stopped prioritizing children of alumni and donors in admissions decisions. Since then, low-income enrollment has risen steadily, reaching 1 in 4 new students this year.

At the same time, the admissions office has stepped up recruiting in overlooked parts of the country, from big cities to small towns.

''When we go out and talk to students, it's not in the fanciest ZIP codes," said Matthew McGann, dean of admissions. ''It's in places where we know there's a lot of talent but not a lot of opportunity.''

Racial diversity does not necessarily follow economic diversity

Without the emphasis on income, those decreases might have been even steeper, said Richard Kahlenberg, a researcher at the Progressive Policy Institute who advocates for class-based affirmative action. He called the latest Pell figures ''a significant step in the right direction.''

''Economic diversity is important in its own right,'' he said. ''It's important that America's leadership class — which disproportionately derives from selective colleges — include people who've faced economic hardships in life.''

Swarthmore College saw the most dramatic leap in Pell enrollment, jumping from 17% to 30% last year.

While many campuses were delaying scholarship decisions until the government resolved problems with a new financial aid form, Swarthmore used other data to figure out applicants' financial need. That allowed Swarthmore to offer scholarships to students while they were still awaiting decisions from other schools.

More financially disadvantaged students ended up enrolling at Swarthmore than officials expected. College leaders also credit their work to reduce campus costs — laundry is free and students get yearly credits for textbooks, for example.

''In a race neutral environment, those numbers are likely to drop," Jim Bock, the admissions dean, said in a statement. ''Not all minority students are low-income, and not all majority students have significant financial means."

The approach risks federal scrutiny

In legal memos, the White House has alleged that prioritizing students based on earnings or geography amounts to a ''racial proxy'' in violation of the Supreme Court's 2023 decision against affirmative action.

In a June letter, Trump officials accused the University of California-Los Angeles of ''race-based admissions in all but name." It criticized UCLA for considering factors like applicants' family income, ZIP code and high school profile.

Colleges often weigh that kind of information in admissions decisions. Yet the Trump administration has declared that the Supreme Court decision outlaws a wide range of long-accepted education practices, including scholarships targeting students in underserved areas.

Earlier this year the College Board — the nonprofit that oversees the SAT — suddenly discontinued an offering that gave admissions offices a wealth of information about applicants, including earnings data from their neighborhoods.

Kahlenberg and others see it as a retreat in the face of government pressure. The College Board offered little explanation, citing changes to federal and state policy around the use of demographic information in admissions.

___