Whether ratings are good or not, Thunder-Pacers could be a series true basketball fans enjoy

OKLAHOMA CITY — It's No. 25 Indiana vs. No. 47 Oklahoma City in the NBA Finals.

That's not their seeding. That's their media market ranking. To some, that might matter. To others, it probably won't — and probably shouldn't — matter whatsoever.

A title matchup that starts Thursday night between the Pacers and Thunder — two young, fun teams that score a ton and are led by marketable stars in reigning MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander for Oklahoma City and Olympic gold medalist Tyrese Haliburton for Indiana — is the type of series that real basketball fans clamor for. It has everything: star power, good coaching, All-Stars on both sides. And it adds to the NBA's recent run of parity.

That's the good news. Here's the inevitable other side: The ratings, especially at the start of the series, probably aren't going to be good because the home markets are so small. Those who like the NBA won't be dissuaded by that. Those who don't like the NBA will tout it as great failure.

''I think this finals is a great representation with the two teams that are in it," Thunder coach Mark Daigneault said. "You know, they're teams that play good, exciting styles of basketball. Players that have great individual stories, teams that have a great story collectively. And we're proud to be a part of that.''

People are watching; they just may not be watching on television. The social media tracking site Videocites says NBA content is getting consumed at a 64% higher clip than last season — 32 billion views and counting so far in these playoffs. Gilgeous-Alexander is the most viewed player, Haliburton is No. 3 and playoff clips of those two have about 1.5 billion views between them to this point.

That's billion, with a B. And speaking of that, there are 76 billion reasons the NBA won't be bothered by whatever the ratings are over the next couple of weeks.

If the ratings tank for Pacers-Thunder, those deals are still worth $76 billion. The ad buys for these playoffs have long been paid for. So, the numbers for this series are largely irrelevant to the NBA's bottom line.

Haliburton was asked Tuesday what fans who watch will see if they tune in to these finals.

''I think (they'll see) two high-level teams that play an elite style of basketball, who share the ball really well, a lot of different people that can chip in,'' Haliburton said. ''I think that's the exciting part about this. I don't want to say it's like a passing of the torch because the old heads are still here. They're still playing very, very well. But definitely to see two young teams, two young organizations, fighting to win a championship, I think is a very big deal."

Late in the regular season, as numbers were bouncing back from a slow start to the season, NBA Commissioner Adam Silver said the league's ratings were down about 2% from a year ago.

''But in this environment, where particularly when you're largely featured in legacy media and particularly cable, and no question cable subscriptions are going down, that seems like a victory,'' Silver said.

''I'd love to play on Christmas Day,'' Gilgeous-Alexander said earlier this season. ''And I think we're that caliber of team. The NBA makes their decisions. Can't slight them for it. Ball's in our court to prove to them why we deserve to be in that game.''

It can easily be argued that both teams did it right: didn't overspend, didn't go into the luxury tax — it's the first finals between two non-taxpayer teams in about two decades — and tried to build around young stars.

And the Thunder and Pacers were teams that combined to win 49 games just three seasons ago; their success now has to be a reason for hope for teams like Utah, Washington, Portland, Charlotte and others that have been sputtering. Turnarounds can happen, and they can be rewarded. Some people will watch, some won't, but true fans probably are expecting a pretty good series.

''I think that's exciting,'' Haliburton said, ''for any basketball fan.''

___

___