When Osmo Vänskä arrived as music director of the Minnesota Orchestra, he told players he wanted them to be the top U.S. orchestra and one of the best in the world.
Doug Wright, principal trombone, recalled the meeting last week as he reflected on a contract proposal from orchestra management that would cut average musician salaries by 34 percent.
"You've seen the press from all over the world," Wright said last week. "We've achieved a level of notoriety and skill that's made us world-renowned. And now we feel we're being penalized for achieving worldwide recognition."
The breadth and depth of the contract proposal stunned the union side. Wright, a veteran negotiator who is on this year's committee, said the board has proposed more than 250 changes to the contract, erasing "40 years of accrued working conditions and rules." And then there is the economic offer that would cut average pay by $45,000. Wright said that, in some cases, salary cuts could reach 50 percent.
While Wright and other musicians are confused and angry, management has said that desperate times require desperate measures. "Our musicians must play their part" in the financial recovery, management said on its website.
The unprecedented public airing of details of the Minnesota Orchestra's contract proposal last week triggered another round of debate in the symphonic world about the affordability of excellence.
"We're threading the needle," said Richard Davis, the former board chairman who heads the management negotiating team. "This is going to be very challenging, to find a way to protect the artistic integrity of this world-class orchestra and not lose the players that have made it that way."
Trouble all over