MINNEAPOLIS — One of the top environmental issues in the legislative session that opens in January could be how best to protect Minnesota's wetlands.
The GOP takeover of the Minnesota House has changed the landscape for the environment and natural resources at the Capitol. Republican leaders have given a strong signal of their priorities by restructuring the committees that will deal with those issues. There will be a new Mining and Outdoor Recreation Policy Committee, for one thing.
The committee lineup remains the same in the Senate, where Democrats remain in control.
Here's a look at what major players expect will be likely themes:
WETLANDS
Minnesota law aims for no net loss of wetlands. If a project destroys a certain number of acres of wetlands, it's supposed to restore or create a similar number nearby. That's been hard for the mining industry in northeastern Minnesota, where fewer wetlands have been lost compared with the rest of the state, so fewer options are available for restoring or creating them. Rep. Denny McNamara, R-Hastings, chairman of the Environment and Natural Resources Policy and Finance Committee, said it might make more sense to restore former wetlands farther away from new or expanding mines, perhaps producing more acres of better quality wetlands in the process. "It could be a win-won for the environment," he said. But Gary Botzek, executive director of the Minnesota Conservation Federation, said he expects pushback from some environmental groups.
MINING
Rep. Tom Hackbarth, R-Cedar, chairman of the new Mining and Outdoor Recreation Policy Committee, said he expects his panel to look for ways to encourage copper-nickel mining in northeastern Minnesota, a sensitive issue he believes Democrats have largely ignored in recent years. He said he wants to "bring forth some legislation that's going to get the ball rolling up there," and see what obstacles could be removed. "This is an opportunity for Minnesota to grow jobs and grow our economy," he said. "If we can do it in an environmentally friendly way there's no reason we shouldn't be doing it." But environmentalists can be expected to resist any specific proposals for weakening clean water protections to benefit the mining industry.