"Wal-Mart hammered by judge," shouted a front-page Star Tribune headline earlier this month. The Dakota County judge -- responding to a class-action assault on the giant retailer -- labeled Wal-Mart "dehumanizing" and set it up for a possible $2 billion penalty.
Many Minnesotans probably shrugged. What else is new? The story seemed consistent with charges we've heard for years: Wal-Mart exploits its workers by paying skinflint wages and skimping on health insurance. Not to mention driving legions of mom-and-pop stores out of business.
With such a reputation for ruthlessness, Wal-Mart must be struggling to find workers, right?
Yet when the company opened a new store in St. Paul's Midway area in May 2004, about 6,000 applicants vied for 325 job openings, according to Joyce Niska, the store's acting manager in 2005. That, too, was nothing new. For years, people have beaten down the doors to work at Wal-Mart.
Wal-Mart's more than 1.3 million American employees aren't stupid. The company's wages and fringe benefits -- including health care coverage and retirement benefits -- are comparable to those of other retailers, according to a study by Richard Vedder, an Ohio University economist.
Wal-Mart pays as well as Target, according to Chuck Denny, who analyzed the company in an April study for the University of Minnesota's Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs.
The average wage for regular, full-time hourly Wal-Mart associates in our state is $11.30, according to Wal-Mart's website, and employees are eligible for performance-based bonuses.
And forget that tired line about dead-end jobs. Two-thirds of store managers were once hourly workers, according to the company.