SEATTLE - The U.S. Army is seeking the death penalty against a soldier accused of killing 16 Afghan villagers in a predawn rampage in March, a punishment some experts say could be hard for prosecutors to obtain given that he was serving his fourth deployment at the time.
The announcement Wednesday followed a pretrial hearing last month for Staff Sgt. Robert Bales, 39, who faces premeditated murder and other charges in the attack on two villages in southern Afghanistan.
Prosecutors said Bales left his remote southern Afghanistan base early on March 11, attacked one village and returned to the base, then slipped away again to attack another nearby compound. Of the 16 people killed, nine were children.
The decision to put the death penalty on the table drew harsh words from Bales' lawyer, John Henry Browne, who met with Army officials last week to dissuade them from seeking execution.
"The Army is not taking responsibility for Sgt. Bales and other soldiers that the Army knowingly sends into combat situations with diagnosed PTSD, concussive head injuries and other injuries," Browne said. "The Army is trying to take the focus off the failure of its decisions, and the failure of the war itself, and making Sgt. Bales out to be a rogue soldier."
Elizabeth Hillman, president of the National Institute of Military Justice, said it could be difficult to convince a unanimous court-martial jury that the death penalty should apply, but the Army wants to make a statement about protecting against unnecessary civilian deaths in wartime.
Dan Conway, a civilian military defense lawyer, said Bales should be punished if convicted. But Conway added: "He was not a mass murderer on his first deployment."
"To refer a case as a capital case where the soldier was on his fourth deployment and had never, as far as I can tell, engaged in misconduct before is to ignore the Army's own failures in treating mental health and screening unhealthy soldiers from the battlefield," Conway said.