Supervalu Inc. has agreed to pay $3.2 million to 110 workers to resolve allegations it systematically terminated disabled employees at Chicago-area supermarkets, one of the largest such settlements under the Americans With Disabilities Act.
A federal judge in Chicago signed a consent decree this week resolving a 2009 class-action suit the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission had filed against Eden Prairie-based Supervalu and its Jewel-Osco chain, the dominant supermarket operator in Chicago.
The EEOC alleged that Jewel had a "policy and practice" of terminating employees with disabilities at the end of their medical leaves, instead of bringing them back to work with reasonable accommodations -- as required by the Americans With Disabilities Act.
Going back to 2003, about 1,000 Jewel workers were allegedly terminated under this policy, the EEOC claims. However, not all of those former employees wanted to participate in the suit, or were found eligible to participate by the EEOC.
The 110 workers who will share the $3.2 million Supervalu payout will get $29,000 apiece on average. That per-person award is the highest ever in a discrimination case involving the Americans With Disabilities Act, said Ethan Cohen, a trial attorney in the EEOC's Chicago office.
The previous high -- $26,000 -- came after a suit against Sears Holdings Corp. that also involved the alleged firing of workers returning from medical disability leaves. The Sears case, settled in September 2009, featured the largest total payout for an EEOC disabilities act suit: $6.2 million.
In light of the Supervalu and Sears cases, it appears there's a "fairly common employment" practice of extending disability benefits with no intention of actually returning workers to a job, Cohen said.
"We get the sense that employers believe it's cheaper to extend benefits to employees than to bring them back," he said. "We hope that with this case and the Sears case we are sending a message that this is not an acceptable business practice."